Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cacowards"
From DoomWiki.org
(→Size of article) |
Eris Falling (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Now that this article contains an entire decade worth of awards, I wonder if we should think about starting a new one for the next decade? At some point it's going to become unwieldy. (Might be there already, to be honest :P ) --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 17:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | Now that this article contains an entire decade worth of awards, I wonder if we should think about starting a new one for the next decade? At some point it's going to become unwieldy. (Might be there already, to be honest :P ) --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 17:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Maybe each yearly Cacowards could get a separate article, and this would be replaced by a full list having only a short paragraph blurb per yearly section, with a "main article: Cacowards YEAR" hatnote. Most of the content in the introduction, presenting the evolution of the award (people leaving, joining, awards retired or introduced, etc.) could be spread out in these short blurbs and taken out of the main section. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] ([[User talk:Gez|talk]]) 17:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | :Maybe each yearly Cacowards could get a separate article, and this would be replaced by a full list having only a short paragraph blurb per yearly section, with a "main article: Cacowards YEAR" hatnote. Most of the content in the introduction, presenting the evolution of the award (people leaving, joining, awards retired or introduced, etc.) could be spread out in these short blurbs and taken out of the main section. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] ([[User talk:Gez|talk]]) 17:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I like Gez's idea, but I wonder if maybe yearly articles would be too short if it's just an introduction then a list. I vote try it and see how it looks. --[[User:Eris Falling|Eris Falling]] ([[User talk:Eris Falling|talk]]) 18:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 14 December 2014
Size of article
Now that this article contains an entire decade worth of awards, I wonder if we should think about starting a new one for the next decade? At some point it's going to become unwieldy. (Might be there already, to be honest :P ) --Quasar (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe each yearly Cacowards could get a separate article, and this would be replaced by a full list having only a short paragraph blurb per yearly section, with a "main article: Cacowards YEAR" hatnote. Most of the content in the introduction, presenting the evolution of the award (people leaving, joining, awards retired or introduced, etc.) could be spread out in these short blurbs and taken out of the main section. --Gez (talk) 17:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I like Gez's idea, but I wonder if maybe yearly articles would be too short if it's just an introduction then a list. I vote try it and see how it looks. --Eris Falling (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
