Difference between revisions of "Talk:Super NES"

From DoomWiki.org

(Music)
(Music: Disagree mostly while respecting opinion on POV part.)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
I suppose that "generally" does leave room for dissent, but it still feels too biased in favor of the music. That many people like it should certainly stay noted, but I feel that it's too subjective as for the quality of it. I don't think anyone can deny that the 3DO version's music had high production values, regardless of anyone's taste of the changes made. I'm not so sure about the production values of the SNES music, though. [[User:Sodaholic|Sodaholic]] 22:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 
I suppose that "generally" does leave room for dissent, but it still feels too biased in favor of the music. That many people like it should certainly stay noted, but I feel that it's too subjective as for the quality of it. I don't think anyone can deny that the 3DO version's music had high production values, regardless of anyone's taste of the changes made. I'm not so sure about the production values of the SNES music, though. [[User:Sodaholic|Sodaholic]] 22:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
: I highly dislike "some do and some don't" or "this but that" on wiki articles because it is often times both obvious, and makes for difficult reading. If you feel that opinion is still too POV, then the statement should be removed from the article entirely as opposed to compromising the formal tone of the writing. There is no reason to not mention the SPC700. This wiki has a lot more technical stuff than that and enough people know what a "SPC" is to understand the relationship. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] 22:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:47, 17 April 2014

Doomworld forums thread about easter egg in end credits: [1].    Ryan W 01:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Auto-import today

Er, I should have mentioned that I was copying content from doom.wikia.com.  :P     Ryan W 21:15, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Can anyone confirm that Nintendo themselves wanted or removed some of the Hell references from the game, as claimed by the article?

Music

I somewhat question how it's being described in this article. I think it's pointless to mention the SNES's SPC hardware, as it's not notably different in general function than the Gravis Ultrasound. I also don't think it's fair to say that it's "generally considered to be of high quality." Although I'm probably in the minority on this, I absolutely cannot stand the SNES version's music, as I don't like the instrumental changes, and can't shake the feeling that the timing and rhythm is way off. I honestly consider it to be very poorly handled. Can't the "some dissaprove" line stay?

I suppose that "generally" does leave room for dissent, but it still feels too biased in favor of the music. That many people like it should certainly stay noted, but I feel that it's too subjective as for the quality of it. I don't think anyone can deny that the 3DO version's music had high production values, regardless of anyone's taste of the changes made. I'm not so sure about the production values of the SNES music, though. Sodaholic 22:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

I highly dislike "some do and some don't" or "this but that" on wiki articles because it is often times both obvious, and makes for difficult reading. If you feel that opinion is still too POV, then the statement should be removed from the article entirely as opposed to compromising the formal tone of the writing. There is no reason to not mention the SPC700. This wiki has a lot more technical stuff than that and enough people know what a "SPC" is to understand the relationship. --Quasar 22:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)