Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Doom monsters"
From DoomWiki.org
(→Redesign of 2014-07-08) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Looks fine to me. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] ([[User talk:Gez|talk]]) 07:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | :Looks fine to me. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] ([[User talk:Gez|talk]]) 07:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
:I'm liking it a lot. --[[User:Kyano|Kyano]] ([[User talk:Kyano|talk]]) 13:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | :I'm liking it a lot. --[[User:Kyano|Kyano]] ([[User talk:Kyano|talk]]) 13:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think it looks great. Two side remarks: the "spilling over" depends on one's font size, screen resolution, etc. (it wasn't doing that for me). Also, I don't remember the capitalized/uncapitalized issue being settled, but I hope I'm wrong because it was such a lame thing to argue over. :> I personally prefer them capitalized, and for navboxes specifically, I think it helps usability by making neighboring links look more separated. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] ([[User talk:Ryan W|talk]]) 09:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:01, 10 July 2014
Redesign of 2014-07-08
I noticed that not only did the template just look bad on articles, with Final boss spilling over a line, it was also generating invalid HTML by splitting a div tag across table cells (two block level elements cannot overlap as such). I took advantage of this, together with earlier complaints about the lower-casing of article titles looking bad, and the pressing need to add parameters to the Prettynavbar template, to come up with this redesign. I would appreciate comments and can make compromises if necessary.
If this design or a compromise based on it is acceptable, I'll redesign the rest of the navbar style templates to match it. --Quasar (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. --Gez (talk) 07:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm liking it a lot. --Kyano (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think it looks great. Two side remarks: the "spilling over" depends on one's font size, screen resolution, etc. (it wasn't doing that for me). Also, I don't remember the capitalized/uncapitalized issue being settled, but I hope I'm wrong because it was such a lame thing to argue over. :> I personally prefer them capitalized, and for navboxes specifically, I think it helps usability by making neighboring links look more separated. Ryan W (talk) 09:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
