Template talk:Wikipedia2

Categorization
Do we really need this template, which (as Bloodshedder might say) encourages editors to annotate omissions rather than fixing them? It's not a rhetorical question &mdash; few of our editors do any copyediting, and maybe such templates would help those editors identify problems.

If we do keep this template, is it likely to be used often enough for its own category, rather than just putting the article into Category:Cleanup? AFAICT very specialized articles (walkthroughs, powerups, editing tutorials, people) do not benefit from Wikipedia links, and for "mainstream" articles that do need them, the Wikipedia article is likely to be very nontechnical, which means that the reader might already recognize the term, which means that our article isn't fatally incomplete without the link.

Opinions? Complaints? Advice? Ryan W 03:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)