User talk:Dynamo128

Template map links
Hi, I'd really appreciate it if you start using the maplinkgen (or at least ml) template to prevent copy-paste errors and malformed paths. Everyone makes mistakes, I make mistakes too, that's okay and not why I'm writing, but these templates at least help significantly reduce the chance of some types of mistakes. I sometimes catch a mistake before it does much damage (like the former example), but the latter one in particular wasted more than half an hour of my time to start over with clean pages & map views and related fixes. Thanks. --Xymph (talk) 07:43, 15 January 2021 (CST)
 * My apologies for the errors, I will start using the new template as you request, thanks for the heads up! And btw, thanks for cleaning up the articles, I try to double-check everything but it seems more mistakes than I wanted have slipped through... --Dynamo128 (talk) 07:46, 15 January 2021 (CST)
 * I understand, that happens to everyone from time to time. And if I catch them in time, it's of little concern. Unfortunately that didn't happen with Estranged. --Xymph (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2021 (CST)
 * Oh, on that note, MAP31 of Biowar also has an unfortunate typo on it, it's supposed to be Juggalo but is instead Juggelo. My bad, that was from long ago. --Dynamo128 (talk) 07:48, 15 January 2021 (CST)
 * Biowar.wad has no maps list (in biowar.txt or mapinfo/dehacked lump) so the CWILV30 lump is leading, which spells it Juggelo Funhouse. So no worries. :) --Xymph (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2021 (CST)

King
Hi, why would you revert what was already confirmed elsewhere and checked by an editor (i.e. me, but that's not the reason I'm writing)? --Xymph (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2021 (CDT)
 * Because the edit itself is nonsensical. I'm not saying it's not worth elaborating on the texture or the story behind it, but saying "it's not sure what he is king of" is IMO one step away from vandalism, as far as I am concerned, because "tom is king" means nothing more than "tom is great", and adding "sorry, king of what?" is either a joke or, like I said, vandalism. While I did find it a bit curious that you approved the message, my understanding was, as you seem to be confirming, that you wanted more information regarding the texture's meaning, but this is not the way to do about it, as far as I am concerned, and if I see content that approaches vandalism, I'd opt for its removal regardless of who checked it. I should also mention that the user who made the edit has apparently been banned for trolling elsewhere, and I see several other edits by them have been reverted. --Dynamo128 (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2021 (CDT)


 * I see. While I agree some other edits by MT were vandalous or of sub-par quality, calling this edit "one step away from vandalism" seems too strong a verdict to me. And I don't follow (nor care much for) what users do elsewhere, it's their behavior on the wiki that matters on the wiki. But yeah, if the meaning of the texture is expanded upon, there are probably better ways to do that, from scratch. --Xymph (talk) 14:15, 21 August 2021 (CDT)

Title screens
Hi, when uploading title screens, please include the additional category which I now have to add every time... Thanks. --Xymph (talk) 10:31, 4 October 2021 (CDT)