Talk:D!ZONE

Allegations of trademark infringement must be substantiated
The allegations of trademark infringement added to this article are potentially libelous content under the law. Unless a civil action was undertaken with regard to this which can be cited, and had an outcome in the plaintiff's favor, I highly suggest that this information be removed from the article immediately. I am not a lawyer, and this is not to be construed as legal advice. --Quasar 17:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I have removed the material myself due to lack of response, but feel free to argue for or against restoring it. --Quasar 19:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * IANAL and haven't had occasion (fortunately) even to refine armchair opinions on libel law, but I endorse your action. As pointed out by Nuxius years ago, we're not a forum site, so it's not our place to just chuck mud around in the main space with no sources.    Ryan W 02:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

D·1000
This compilation CD called D·1000, incorrectly called D! 1000 at, doesn't seem to have anything to do with the D!ZONE line. It was published by GAMETEK, not by WizardWorks, and doesn't have the same branding or style. I doubt it is notable to have its own article, though perhaps a "Compilation CDs" article which covers all the ones which are NOT part of a larger series, including such ones as DemonGate, would be appropriate. I have removed all information regarding D·1000 from this article until evidence comes to light that connects it to the D!ZONE series. This article is not meant to serve as a list of links to unrelated compilations. --Quasar 16:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Do you suppose the cover image needs to be deleted as well, unless we're willing to keep it for the 6 years it might take that article to appear?   Ryan W 22:59, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I would be happy to provide some facts on any of the shovelware compilations I personally own (link to list available on request, don't want to just post it in case it comes off as spam), such as publisher, date, general overview of the contents, and so forth, as long as it's not going to be nixed as "not notable enough". -- ETTiNGRiNDER (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)