Talk:Inkworks

Categorization
While this tool certainly does qualify as a miscellaneous editor, the reasoning given for the change is not kosher. Let us please avoid "if A is incorrectly categorized, then B must be as well" style of logic and instead start appropriately categorizing things. It seems like a defeatist or adversarial type of attitude where informational deterioration is considered inevitable and must therefore be embraced whole hog, instead of actively opposed. I do not believe an ACS decompiler in fact qualifies as an editor of any type and is a direct example of what should be categorized directly under or within a subcategory of Category:Tools, if we are in fact going to retain it. --Quasar (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2015 (CDT)