Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Exploitable bugs"
From DoomWiki.org
(Well...) |
(Re: "a broader 'exploits' category") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Such a long description seems inappropriate in a category page, and in any case the category might not be a good idea. Perhaps a broader "exploits" category which would include other things such as program vulnerabilities would make sense. Of course, the category would be combined with the bugs category in articles about bugs that can be somehow exploited or used to advantage by players. <small>[[User:Who is like God?|Who is like God?]] 09:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)</small> | Such a long description seems inappropriate in a category page, and in any case the category might not be a good idea. Perhaps a broader "exploits" category which would include other things such as program vulnerabilities would make sense. Of course, the category would be combined with the bugs category in articles about bugs that can be somehow exploited or used to advantage by players. <small>[[User:Who is like God?|Who is like God?]] 09:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)</small> | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Are you talking about separating the technical and "exploit" aspects of a bug into two articles? That sounds like a good idea (we definitely need more tactical articles). [[User:UberDoomer|UberDoomer]], for some previous discussion of sorting large numbers of articles with a table vs. with categories, see [[Talk:Engine bug#vague definition of bug? categorizing the bugs might help....|here]]. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 17:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 21 August 2008
Such a long description seems inappropriate in a category page, and in any case the category might not be a good idea. Perhaps a broader "exploits" category which would include other things such as program vulnerabilities would make sense. Of course, the category would be combined with the bugs category in articles about bugs that can be somehow exploited or used to advantage by players. Who is like God? 09:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Are you talking about separating the technical and "exploit" aspects of a bug into two articles? That sounds like a good idea (we definitely need more tactical articles). UberDoomer, for some previous discussion of sorting large numbers of articles with a table vs. with categories, see here. Ryan W 17:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
