Difference between revisions of "Doom Wiki talk:Criteria for website articles"

From DoomWiki.org

m
(agreed)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, <s>ugo.com</s> frag.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 
:I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, <s>ugo.com</s> frag.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I hadn't really thought of it like that, good point.  Each case would have to be treated on it's individual merits, so I suppose that item can be removed from the list. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 15:08, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:08, 29 August 2005

Sites with a significant number of hosted sites that meet this criteria are also eligible.

I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, ugo.com frag.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- Jdowland 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
I hadn't really thought of it like that, good point. Each case would have to be treated on it's individual merits, so I suppose that item can be removed from the list. - DooMAD 15:08, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)