Difference between revisions of "Doom Wiki talk:Criteria for website articles"

From DoomWiki.org

(disagree: ' Sites with a significant number of hosted sites that meet this criteria are also eligible.')
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'' Sites with a significant number of hosted sites that meet this criteria are also eligible.''
 
'' Sites with a significant number of hosted sites that meet this criteria are also eligible.''
  
:I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, ugo.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)
+
:I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, <s>ugo.com</s> frag.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:58, 28 August 2005

Sites with a significant number of hosted sites that meet this criteria are also eligible.

I don't agree with this one. I guess its in there to cover MancuNET, but then we should have articles for frad.org, alkali.org, which nobody really cares about anymore, or slipgate.org, or telefragged.com, ugo.com frag.com.. which are really unrelated. Stretching things further, I host at least two prominent doomer's webpages :P -- Jdowland 09:57, 28 Aug 2005 (UTC)