Difference between revisions of "Doom Wiki talk:List of common contractions"

From DoomWiki.org

(Deletion?)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Is this page actually in use now?  The [[Doom Wiki:List of common misspellings|list of misspellings]] supposedly provides reference data for one of Fraggle's tools (although I doubt he is running that anymore either), but the contractions just seem to be taking up space.    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 
Is this page actually in use now?  The [[Doom Wiki:List of common misspellings|list of misspellings]] supposedly provides reference data for one of Fraggle's tools (although I doubt he is running that anymore either), but the contractions just seem to be taking up space.    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 +
: Not sure it's really "taking up space" as we have space to spare but, then again I'm not really going to argue for its usefulness. People who don't know this information already aren't likely to bother looking it up. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] 03:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 +
: I suppose it could be put as {{tl|outdated}} instead of deleted. I hesitate to delete it because it's not wrong: contractions aren't encyclopedic and shouldn't be used :p Except on talk pages of course. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] ([[User talk:Gez|talk]]) 19:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:59, 23 August 2014

Deletion?

Is this page actually in use now?  The list of misspellings supposedly provides reference data for one of Fraggle's tools (although I doubt he is running that anymore either), but the contractions just seem to be taking up space.    Ryan W 02:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Not sure it's really "taking up space" as we have space to spare but, then again I'm not really going to argue for its usefulness. People who don't know this information already aren't likely to bother looking it up. --Quasar 03:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I suppose it could be put as {{outdated}} instead of deleted. I hesitate to delete it because it's not wrong: contractions aren't encyclopedic and shouldn't be used :p Except on talk pages of course. --Gez (talk) 19:59, 23 August 2014 (UTC)