Difference between revisions of "Talk:Websites"

From DoomWiki.org

(comment)
(forgot the link)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:That would be the best way to do it.  I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category.  If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
 
:That would be the best way to do it.  I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category.  If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
 +
 +
::I decided that I have neither the time or the patience to sort 276 sites into suitable categories.  Instead, I opted for a simple [http://www.teamhellspawn.com/definitive_links.txt text document] that I can update as required.  I know it's not ideal wiki style, but I found it too much of a subjective matter to decide what category to put something in, or even what the categories themselves should be.  - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 18:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:50, 20 April 2005

What's the intention for this page? The choice of URLs seems fairly arbitrary. Plans to categorise?

That would be the best way to do it. I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category. If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - DooMAD 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
I decided that I have neither the time or the patience to sort 276 sites into suitable categories. Instead, I opted for a simple text document that I can update as required. I know it's not ideal wiki style, but I found it too much of a subjective matter to decide what category to put something in, or even what the categories themselves should be. - DooMAD 18:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)