Difference between revisions of "Talk:Websites"
From DoomWiki.org
(comment) |
(forgot the link) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That would be the best way to do it. I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category. If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST) | :That would be the best way to do it. I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category. If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::I decided that I have neither the time or the patience to sort 276 sites into suitable categories. Instead, I opted for a simple [http://www.teamhellspawn.com/definitive_links.txt text document] that I can update as required. I know it's not ideal wiki style, but I found it too much of a subjective matter to decide what category to put something in, or even what the categories themselves should be. - [[User:DooMAD|DooMAD]] 18:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:50, 20 April 2005
What's the intention for this page? The choice of URLs seems fairly arbitrary. Plans to categorise?
- That would be the best way to do it. I've been compiling a huge list of Doom sites for my own links page, but currently only in a loose alphabetical order, not by category. If I find time, I'll try to sort them into a usable format. - DooMAD 20:12, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
- I decided that I have neither the time or the patience to sort 276 sites into suitable categories. Instead, I opted for a simple text document that I can update as required. I know it's not ideal wiki style, but I found it too much of a subjective matter to decide what category to put something in, or even what the categories themselves should be. - DooMAD 18:48, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)