Talk:Bella II

Revision as of 19:37, 7 December 2019 by Ryan W (talk | contribs) (Categorize deletion thread as possible notability/scope precedent. This is very subjective, so if anyone feels strongly, feel free to revert me; see the original discussion.)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Revision as of 19:37, 7 December 2019 by Ryan W (talk | contribs) (Categorize deletion thread as possible notability/scope precedent. This is very subjective, so if anyone feels strongly, feel free to revert me; see the original discussion.)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

DeletionEdit

Edit-paste.svgThe content associated with this talk page was considered for deletion, and either was deleted, or was kept after a period of discussion. This page has been retained for historical reference regarding the deletion process, or in case of future restoration of any deleted content.
User:Insertwackynamehere wants this deleted. If he posts reasons I'll re-add the {{delete}} template, but I'm removing it until then. oTHErONE (Contribs) 09:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
This is technically against our deletion policy.  If you disagree with Wacky, fine; do it by voting "keep", not by trying to stifle the whole conversation.
Admittedly, deletion seems highly unlikely in light of our policy about PWADs.  Is that why you did it?    Ryan W 10:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
That, and he didn't post reasons for deletion. I wasn't trying to stifle conversation, by the way, I was trying to encourage conversation by making him post reasons. This doesn't matter now, but just so you know... oTHErONE (Contribs) 04:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I suppose that makes sense, but one important effect of the deletion policy is to keep the article in Category:Delete for at least a week, so it can be noticed by editors who don't read the entire changelog (or even check it on a daily basis).  That's especially important when neither editor uses the edit summary to indicate that deletion was being discussed, as was the case here.
The immediate cause of the current policy was that certain people would apparently remove the {{delete}} template to express their displeasure that a discussion was even occurring.  It doesn't sound like you did that, which is good.  But just so you know.    Ryan W 05:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you assuming good faith. :-) oTHErONE (Contribs) 13:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind, I'm sorry I posted it. I was browsing new stuff quickly and thought this was a joke. I'm removing the template. --{{SUBST:nosubst|User:Insertwackynamehere/Signature}} 01:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. oTHErONE (Contribs) 04:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Return to "Bella II" page.