Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boris Iwanksi"
From DoomWiki.org
(yup but…) |
Bloodshedder (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Yup but the history is transferred in the new page, so if we erase the wrong article we won’t loose anything. [[User:Ducon|Ducon]] 11:05, 22 Mar 2005 (EST) | :::Yup but the history is transferred in the new page, so if we erase the wrong article we won’t loose anything. [[User:Ducon|Ducon]] 11:05, 22 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Leaving the redirect here (redirects are automatically made when a page is moved) makes more sense than deleting it. Even on Wikipedia, common misspellings are made into redirects to the proper articles. [[User:Bloodshedder|Bloodshedder]] 13:52, 22 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 22 March 2005
Why is a blank page better than a revert?
It's not, it's supposed to be a redirect to the proper name, which I just restored. Bloodshedder 21:34, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
- But it’s NOT his name? Why we should keep a false name? Why not Boris Iawanksi, Boris Iwamsky and so on? Ducon 23:57, 21 Mar 2005 (EST)
- I guess because we (I) inadvertently populated the page, so people could stumble across it in histories, link backs, etc. (for that reason, before anyone actually clicks on 'em, I'd suggest removing those two examples from your message here; :) )Jon
- Yup but the history is transferred in the new page, so if we erase the wrong article we won’t loose anything. Ducon 11:05, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)
- Leaving the redirect here (redirects are automatically made when a page is moved) makes more sense than deleting it. Even on Wikipedia, common misspellings are made into redirects to the proper articles. Bloodshedder 13:52, 22 Mar 2005 (EST)
