Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chainsaw Zombie"

From DoomWiki.org

(how about a redirect?)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There is not enough material to justify a separate article for each doom 3 zombie ''type'' - just put the lot in [[Zombie (Doom 3)]]. They're not even in the doom 3 monsters template. -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 10:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 
There is not enough material to justify a separate article for each doom 3 zombie ''type'' - just put the lot in [[Zombie (Doom 3)]]. They're not even in the doom 3 monsters template. -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 10:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 
:I agree. How about '''redirecting''' it to [[Zombie (Doom 3)]] to prevent recreation in the future, and because it appears to be a valid search topic? [[User:DomRem|<font color = red>Dom</font><font color = blue>Rem</font>]] | <small>[[User_talk:DomRem|Yeah?]]</small> 05:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 
:I agree. How about '''redirecting''' it to [[Zombie (Doom 3)]] to prevent recreation in the future, and because it appears to be a valid search topic? [[User:DomRem|<font color = red>Dom</font><font color = blue>Rem</font>]] | <small>[[User_talk:DomRem|Yeah?]]</small> 05:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I second the deletion. BTW, I removed the (mostly red) links to the individual zombie types on the monsters page. -- [[User:TheDarkArchon|TheDarkArchon]] 00:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:04, 13 April 2006

There is not enough material to justify a separate article for each doom 3 zombie type - just put the lot in Zombie (Doom 3). They're not even in the doom 3 monsters template. -- Jdowland 10:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree. How about redirecting it to Zombie (Doom 3) to prevent recreation in the future, and because it appears to be a valid search topic? DomRem | Yeah? 05:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
I second the deletion. BTW, I removed the (mostly red) links to the individual zombie types on the monsters page. -- TheDarkArchon 00:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)