Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chocolate-doom (IRC channel)"
From DoomWiki.org
(→Mewse isn't on the channel anymore) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:The current and former channel regulars are now both listed in the article. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your moderators-related comment though. There are only a few moderators (which are actually called channel operators in IRC terms) on the channel, but I guess we could mention who they are/were in the article. If that's what you mean. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 06:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | :The current and former channel regulars are now both listed in the article. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your moderators-related comment though. There are only a few moderators (which are actually called channel operators in IRC terms) on the channel, but I guess we could mention who they are/were in the article. If that's what you mean. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 06:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::On second glance at the page I realize I misunderstood the list entirely. I thought it was a list of ops. I feel that current and former channel ops would be suitable content for the article. Listing regulars is pretty insignificant, especially when you consider how often someone might become a regular or not. For example I certainly wouldn't want to see a list of all Doomworld forum regulars in the corresponding article. [[User:Zaximus|Zack]] 23:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I've personally never been a fan of having "channel regular" or "moderator" lists in the IRC channel articles anyway. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 16:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:37, 13 January 2008
Mewse isn't on the channel anymore
Hm ... Even though it's "only" an IRC channel, I am not a huge fan of throwing information away just because it's not current. Just because something once was fact doesn't mean it should be forgotten. I mean, we're retrogamers, aren't we? :)
Would it be acceptable to list the current moderators and then list "previous moderators" or something to that effect? Zack 01:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- The current and former channel regulars are now both listed in the article. I'm not entirely sure what you mean by your moderators-related comment though. There are only a few moderators (which are actually called channel operators in IRC terms) on the channel, but I guess we could mention who they are/were in the article. If that's what you mean. -- Janizdreg 06:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- On second glance at the page I realize I misunderstood the list entirely. I thought it was a list of ops. I feel that current and former channel ops would be suitable content for the article. Listing regulars is pretty insignificant, especially when you consider how often someone might become a regular or not. For example I certainly wouldn't want to see a list of all Doomworld forum regulars in the corresponding article. Zack 23:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've personally never been a fan of having "channel regular" or "moderator" lists in the IRC channel articles anyway. Fraggle 16:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
