Editing Talk:Comparison of source ports
From DoomWiki.org
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Nice from you to ad some information. Just had my lunch break and I know that some info was still incorrect. As you might have seen GEZ, it's a work in progress. Yes, it's odd that only chocolade doom is in the second list, but that's why we should expend it. I wanted to give it a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions] look, but that of cause takes time. I do believe it's good to make a comparison page, because this is a 'wiki' and with so many source ports, one should be able to make a desent comparison, especialy if you see the [[Source port]]page. That one ain't very pretty or useful either! so please, to all, help us making a nice comparison list.[[User:Eonfge|Eonfge]] 11:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ::Nice from you to ad some information. Just had my lunch break and I know that some info was still incorrect. As you might have seen GEZ, it's a work in progress. Yes, it's odd that only chocolade doom is in the second list, but that's why we should expend it. I wanted to give it a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions] look, but that of cause takes time. I do believe it's good to make a comparison page, because this is a 'wiki' and with so many source ports, one should be able to make a desent comparison, especialy if you see the [[Source port]]page. That one ain't very pretty or useful either! so please, to all, help us making a nice comparison list.[[User:Eonfge|Eonfge]] 11:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | :::It'll only be potentially useful if it's kept up to date. And I wouldn't bet on it. A system of templates such as | + | :::It'll only be potentially useful if it's kept up to date. And I wouldn't bet on it. A system of templates such as [[Template:Latest ZDoom|this one]], but for each port, could make it more useful as it would update both a central activity comparison page and the ports' own articles, but that too rely on it being maintained (nobody bothered to update the [[EDGE]] page until I just did it right now). --[[User:Gez|Gez]] 11:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
:::: That's why I advice to keep it 'general'. So no deep backgrounds on all kernal-supports and render-modes. As long as it provides a accepteble comparison between the different ports. [[User:Eonfge|Eonfge]] 12:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | :::: That's why I advice to keep it 'general'. So no deep backgrounds on all kernal-supports and render-modes. As long as it provides a accepteble comparison between the different ports. [[User:Eonfge|Eonfge]] 12:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |