Difference between revisions of "Talk:DECORATE"
From DoomWiki.org
Redneckerz (talk | contribs) m (→ping) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==ping== | ==ping== | ||
Can someone approve the revision I made a few days ago? Also, there are pending changes at [[Doom community jargon]] worth approving. --[[User:PhilthyPhilistine|PhilthyPhilistine]] ([[User talk:PhilthyPhilistine|talk]]) 12:13, 9 January 2022 (CST) | Can someone approve the revision I made a few days ago? Also, there are pending changes at [[Doom community jargon]] worth approving. --[[User:PhilthyPhilistine|PhilthyPhilistine]] ([[User talk:PhilthyPhilistine|talk]]) 12:13, 9 January 2022 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : There is no need to leave ping's - especially on such short notice. I did look upon your suggested changes, i am not going to interfere: The community jargon one, for example, this one - https://doomwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doom_community_jargon&oldid=293879&diff=cur - is very much a rephrasing rather than an enhancement. I leave it upon more seasoned Wiki editors to decide any ruling on this. Personally, i would have considered it surplus and unnecessary. --[[User:Redneckerz|Redneckerz]] ([[User talk:Redneckerz|talk]]) 12:22, 9 January 2022 (CST) |
Revision as of 13:22, 9 January 2022
this article should clearly indicate that there is one DECORATE lump per WAD (or PK3 -- if that's actually true) as oppose to per-map or whatever. -- Shambler (talk) 09:08, 13 May 2018 (CDT)
ping
Can someone approve the revision I made a few days ago? Also, there are pending changes at Doom community jargon worth approving. --PhilthyPhilistine (talk) 12:13, 9 January 2022 (CST)
- There is no need to leave ping's - especially on such short notice. I did look upon your suggested changes, i am not going to interfere: The community jargon one, for example, this one - https://doomwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Doom_community_jargon&oldid=293879&diff=cur - is very much a rephrasing rather than an enhancement. I leave it upon more seasoned Wiki editors to decide any ruling on this. Personally, i would have considered it surplus and unnecessary. --Redneckerz (talk) 12:22, 9 January 2022 (CST)