Difference between revisions of "Talk:Demonic dagger"

From DoomWiki.org

(Merge: close debate)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: If people deleted articles solely because they were incomplete, then the whole of Wikia would be on shaky ground.  :>    Having said that, it seems in this case that all such subsidiary articles are destined to have only one paragraph each; also, the pre-release versions are technically not "commercial" in the sense used on our policy page.  Therefore, it might make sense to have only one article about the Doom press release beta.  (Someone who has actually played it, i.e. not me, should first confirm that each difference from v1.0/1.1 can be adequately described in a sentence or two.)    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 
: If people deleted articles solely because they were incomplete, then the whole of Wikia would be on shaky ground.  :>    Having said that, it seems in this case that all such subsidiary articles are destined to have only one paragraph each; also, the pre-release versions are technically not "commercial" in the sense used on our policy page.  Therefore, it might make sense to have only one article about the Doom press release beta.  (Someone who has actually played it, i.e. not me, should first confirm that each difference from v1.0/1.1 can be adequately described in a sentence or two.)    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
::I've played the beta, and there should probably just be an item section in the [[Doom press release beta|article]]. (It seems that the article was created from a red link, BTW.) o'''[[User:Otherone|THE]]'''r'''[[User Talk:Otherone|ONE]]''' <sub>([[Special:Contributions/Otherone|Contribs]])</sub> 06:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
+
::I've played the beta, and there should probably just be an item section in the [[Doom press release beta|article]]. (It seems that this article was created from a red link, BTW.) o'''[[User:Otherone|THE]]'''r'''[[User Talk:Otherone|ONE]]''' <sub>([[Special:Contributions/Otherone|Contribs]])</sub> 06:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Merge ==
 +
 
 +
The [[Doom press release beta]] was never commercially released, so according to the [[Doom Wiki:policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]] there should just be a small list of items in the article. Oh yeah, basically all the items just give score, so it won't be necessary to give a description of each item. o'''[[User:Otherone|THE]]'''r'''[[User Talk:Otherone|ONE]]''' <sub>([[Special:Contributions/Otherone|Contribs]])</sub> 12:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
: '''merge''' -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 13:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
: '''Merge and redirect''' per nom.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 13:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
10+ months with no serious debate.&nbsp; The outcome therefore is '''merge'''.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 12:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:22, 16 January 2008

Are people going to make any other articles on the items in the Press Release Beta, because otherwise it should probably be deleted. oTHErONE (Contribs) 02:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

If people deleted articles solely because they were incomplete, then the whole of Wikia would be on shaky ground.  :>    Having said that, it seems in this case that all such subsidiary articles are destined to have only one paragraph each; also, the pre-release versions are technically not "commercial" in the sense used on our policy page.  Therefore, it might make sense to have only one article about the Doom press release beta.  (Someone who has actually played it, i.e. not me, should first confirm that each difference from v1.0/1.1 can be adequately described in a sentence or two.)    Ryan W 02:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I've played the beta, and there should probably just be an item section in the article. (It seems that this article was created from a red link, BTW.) oTHErONE (Contribs) 06:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Merge[edit]

The Doom press release beta was never commercially released, so according to the policies and guidelines there should just be a small list of items in the article. Oh yeah, basically all the items just give score, so it won't be necessary to give a description of each item. oTHErONE (Contribs) 12:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

merge -- Jdowland 13:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Merge and redirect per nom.    Ryan W 13:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

10+ months with no serious debate.  The outcome therefore is merge.    Ryan W 12:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)