Difference between revisions of "Talk:Descript"

From DoomWiki.org

(delete)
(I'm the original developer...)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:'''Delete''' for the reasons Fraggle mentioned. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 06:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 
:'''Delete''' for the reasons Fraggle mentioned. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 06:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== I'm the original developer... ==
 +
 +
Just to let you know that I am the original developer of Descript, so there is no issue with copyright, as the program is freeware, and can be freely distributed anywhere and in any form.
 +
 +
Sorry for posting such a cobbled together entry, but I came across the empty link, and thought it would be worth filling it with something relevant. Given the age of the program, and it's very limited usefulness now, I'm not sure if it's worth putting a lot of time and effort into a proper article, but I may get around to having a go sometime.
 +
 +
So, feel free to delete the article if you want, though I don't see any harm in leaving it there.
 +
 +
Robert.

Revision as of 05:10, 16 August 2007

This is just a copy of the descript text file. I'm nominating this for deletion because it's not clear with its copyright status that we can actually use it on the wiki. Furthermore, a lot of the text here isn't even in an encyclopedic style and I'm not convinced it can be salvaged for a workable article. Fraggle 17:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete for the reasons Fraggle mentioned. -- Janizdreg 06:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm the original developer...

Just to let you know that I am the original developer of Descript, so there is no issue with copyright, as the program is freeware, and can be freely distributed anywhere and in any form.

Sorry for posting such a cobbled together entry, but I came across the empty link, and thought it would be worth filling it with something relevant. Given the age of the program, and it's very limited usefulness now, I'm not sure if it's worth putting a lot of time and effort into a proper article, but I may get around to having a go sometime.

So, feel free to delete the article if you want, though I don't see any harm in leaving it there.

Robert.