Difference between revisions of "Talk:Doom source code oddities"

From DoomWiki.org

Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:: I found it a bit boring but only because I've personally seen these things 1,000 times already in my Doom source hacking adventures :-)  I don't see any reason why the wiki can't have a few more light-hearted articles. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 13:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 
:: I found it a bit boring but only because I've personally seen these things 1,000 times already in my Doom source hacking adventures :-)  I don't see any reason why the wiki can't have a few more light-hearted articles. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 13:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: '''Rename''' to something else, such as ''Doom source code oddities'' or something. [[User:Bloodshedder|Bloodshedder]] 22:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:30, 29 July 2007

uh...what? Bloodshedder 21:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

This has got to be the weirdest "proper" article here ever. I'm not entirely sure if this serves any real purpose, but personally I see it as a pointless list of pointless comments. Therefore I say delete. -- Janizdreg 00:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I thought it was a fun read. Fredrik 08:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I found it a bit boring but only because I've personally seen these things 1,000 times already in my Doom source hacking adventures :-) I don't see any reason why the wiki can't have a few more light-hearted articles. Fraggle 13:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Rename to something else, such as Doom source code oddities or something. Bloodshedder 22:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)