Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eidolon"

From DoomWiki.org

(Relevance of this topic)
(Reply)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Um... what exactly has changed since the 2006 discussions [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Hexen_II/archived] [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Heretic_II/archived] [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Eidolon/archived] to make Eidolon related to Doom, when it wasn't related then?    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 01:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 
Um... what exactly has changed since the 2006 discussions [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Hexen_II/archived] [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Heretic_II/archived] [http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Eidolon/archived] to make Eidolon related to Doom, when it wasn't related then?    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 01:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 +
:The one point that could be made in favor of it ''now'' by opposition to ''[[Doom Wiki:Central Processing/2006#Heretic; Hexen_2, Eidolon, etc.|then]]'' is that pages like [[Wikipedia:Eidolon (Hexen)]] no longer exist and the information that was to be found there in 2006 has been entirely removed now. The other point (viz. "it's not Doom") still stands of course. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] 09:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:18, 30 April 2010

Old discussion moved to /archived. Please discuss the matter of this article's relevance at Doom_Wiki:Central_Processing#Heretic.2FHexen_2.3B_Eidolon.2C_etc.. -- Jdowland 18:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Relevance of this topic

Um... what exactly has changed since the 2006 discussions [1] [2] [3] to make Eidolon related to Doom, when it wasn't related then?    Ryan W 01:00, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

The one point that could be made in favor of it now by opposition to then is that pages like Wikipedia:Eidolon (Hexen) no longer exist and the information that was to be found there in 2006 has been entirely removed now. The other point (viz. "it's not Doom") still stands of course. --Gez 09:18, April 30, 2010 (UTC)