Editing Talk:Encyclopedia Daemonica
From DoomWiki.org
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
: Hello, the PDF includes resources taken from the original doom games which are copyright ID Software, all rights reserved, and so which cannot be distributed under the terms of the GFDL. -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 13:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | : Hello, the PDF includes resources taken from the original doom games which are copyright ID Software, all rights reserved, and so which cannot be distributed under the terms of the GFDL. -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 13:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
− | :: I was just about to suggest that. :> Further, I think it violates fair use for us to host it rather than just linking to it, because the id resources are not being used to illustrate a description of anything published by id. It sounds as though it is indeed notable, in which case [ | + | :: I was just about to suggest that. :> Further, I think it violates fair use for us to host it rather than just linking to it, because the id resources are not being used to illustrate a description of anything published by id. It sounds as though it is indeed notable, in which case [http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&hl=en&num=100&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Encyclopedia+Daemonica&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images choosing another site should be no problem, right?]. IANAL, but even if the graphics were removed, it could be argued that sections II and III are a little too close to paraphrasing. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 17:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
==Edits== | ==Edits== |