Difference between revisions of "Talk:IWAD"
From DoomWiki.org
m (Talk:IWADs moved to Talk:IWAD over redirect: Reverting move; articles should be in singular unless there's a good reason for a plural (mostly when singular and plural mean different things or when only the plural is used).) |
(→ZDoom iwads: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''For example, the Doom II executable cannot be used with a Final Doom IWAD'' Actually, you can do that (see the readme file for PLUVDEMO). How about a different example? :> [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 03:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | ''For example, the Doom II executable cannot be used with a Final Doom IWAD'' Actually, you can do that (see the readme file for PLUVDEMO). How about a different example? :> [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 03:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I notice that Heretic1.wad is listed as "Shareware Hexen". Even though I have never owned shareware Hexen, that just doesn't sound right. Wouldn't that be Shareware Heretic, or is there some zany story behind this that I haven't heard of? -Wagi [[Special:Contributions/69.51.157.227|69.51.157.227]] 14:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | :I notice that Heretic1.wad is listed as "Shareware Hexen". Even though I have never owned shareware Hexen, that just doesn't sound right. Wouldn't that be Shareware Heretic, or is there some zany story behind this that I haven't heard of? -Wagi [[Special:Contributions/69.51.157.227|69.51.157.227]] 14:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == ZDoom iwads == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I do not see a reason why they should be mentioned here. I think this page should describe the topic in basic, vanilla scope which would cover the majority of executables out there. ZDoom article currently has a few words about its iwad identification, so it might be a better place to elaborate on the subject. --[[User:Unmaker|Unmaker]] 04:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:02, 16 October 2012
For example, the Doom II executable cannot be used with a Final Doom IWAD Actually, you can do that (see the readme file for PLUVDEMO). How about a different example? :> Ryan W 03:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I notice that Heretic1.wad is listed as "Shareware Hexen". Even though I have never owned shareware Hexen, that just doesn't sound right. Wouldn't that be Shareware Heretic, or is there some zany story behind this that I haven't heard of? -Wagi 69.51.157.227 14:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
ZDoom iwads[edit]
I do not see a reason why they should be mentioned here. I think this page should describe the topic in basic, vanilla scope which would cover the majority of executables out there. ZDoom article currently has a few words about its iwad identification, so it might be a better place to elaborate on the subject. --Unmaker 04:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)