Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of STO Users"

From DoomWiki.org

(Categorize with tracking template instead of manually. This is the backlog -- trivial vs non-trivial will be assessed later in a separate pass.)
(Apply new "not a precedent" tracking category to deletion thread. This is very subjective, so if anyone feels strongly, feel free to revert me; see the original discussion.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vfd-deleted|trivial=0}}
+
{{Vfd-deleted|trivial=1}}
  
 
I don't think it makes sense to have a list of articles like this. If someone is important enough to have an article about themselves, they should be listed at [[List of Doom community people]]. Merely being an STO user does not necessarily mean they deserve an article. [[User:Bloodshedder|Bloodshedder]] 20:33, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 
I don't think it makes sense to have a list of articles like this. If someone is important enough to have an article about themselves, they should be listed at [[List of Doom community people]]. Merely being an STO user does not necessarily mean they deserve an article. [[User:Bloodshedder|Bloodshedder]] 20:33, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:09, 7 December 2019

Edit-paste.svgThe content associated with this talk page was considered for deletion, and the result of the discussion was Delete. This page has been retained for historical reference regarding the deletion process, or in case of future restoration of any deleted content.

I don't think it makes sense to have a list of articles like this. If someone is important enough to have an article about themselves, they should be listed at List of Doom community people. Merely being an STO user does not necessarily mean they deserve an article. Bloodshedder 20:33, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)