Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of notable WADs"

From DoomWiki.org

(Re: co-op column)
(Legality of Robocop)
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
: Good idea.  There are also levels that work in co-op but not solo (because it takes two people to open the exit room).    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 13:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 
: Good idea.  There are also levels that work in co-op but not solo (because it takes two people to open the exit room).    [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 13:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Legality of Robocop ==
 +
 +
From license.txt:
 +
 +
<pre>
 +
Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may create a map editor, modify maps and
 +
make your own maps (collectively referenced as the "Permitted Derivative
 +
Works") for the Software.  You may not sell or distribute any Permitted
 +
Derivative Works but you may exchange the Permitted Derivative Works at no
 +
charge amongst other end-users.
 +
</pre>
 +
 +
The doom source code license and the GNU GPL don't contain anything particular about new wads in Doom, so I see this as the only possible source by which the Robocop wad could be "illegal".  And while this quote certainly makes it illegal, it also appears to outlaw any wad file that includes something other than maps.  Even if "maps" is considered to include the textures and flats in maps, certainly any wad which replaces menu graphics, sprites, sounds etc would be categorized as illegal.
 +
 +
I'd just like some concrete source on why Robocop is any more or less illegal then a load of other pc/tcs, because without it there's no reason to single it out with the "technically illegal" comment. [[User:Goyuken|Goyuken]] 03:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:50, 15 October 2007

Deathmatch WADs

What deathmatch WADs do you think we should list here? I'd say at least British 11, dweller2, Execution, Judas, the TeamTNT WADs (Bloodlands, Grievance & Pursuit), Vex-Doom and the xfire series should be listed. Janizdreg 18:22, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)

? and squares

The notation doesn't work, in Firefox I see question marks ? and in IE I see squares looking exactly the same. I'm using Unicode in all browsers. 84.10.229.242 08:11, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I have problems in some situations, although I don't have the energy to examine all my locales right now. I'm open to suggestions on how to re-write the page, avoiding these problems. -- Jdowland 08:31, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Just choose something esle, something that will show up OK on all browsers. Why squares? Why don't you choose *, !, @ etc. instead? Or letters - like A, B, C? 84.10.229.242 09:13, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Questions / Critical comments

I'm not quite sure on your notation, does ☐ represent "starts only" i.e. yes, although not tested and not primary purpose? Also I'm not sure about the idea of marking things a "joke wad" since some things, for instance, Action Doom, could arguably be considered a joke wad because it's primarily an attempt at humor but at the same time enough effort was put into it that many people would say it wasn't. I'm curious what other people think. Sarge Baldy 15:56, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Yes, ☐ means that it works but it’s not meaned to be played like this. I think that for joke WADs, it should mark the WADs that fit in the article. Ducon 01:03, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
That byte (or bytes) doesn't display properly in my browser. It seems the page is being sent as UTF-8 so it's probably kosher but maybe annotating in the ASCII subset would cause the fewest problems for people. I'll have a play with my OS encoding settings. Jdowland 07:46, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Does it look like a square? Its supposed to look that way :-)80.168.139.164 11:39, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
In IE/win32; yes. In firefox/win32 and firefox/linux with some latin charset for the latter, no, it varies between a square with hex numbers in it and a question mark. If it's nothing more complex than a square, can I substitute it for some ASCII char? Jdowland 16:41, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
No, this site is coded in utf-8 (you should get a unicode font). Ducon 01:13, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I see, so it's use unicode for the sake of it, rather than because it's useful? Jdowland 08:00, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Unicode IS useful. :-) You can write in english, in french, in arab, in chinese and you even can see maths or misc symbols. Look at the Doomworld forums, they accept japanese or other characters. You want some unicode fonts? Ducon 12:11, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I know unicode is useful - thanks, I have unicode fonts (my locale isn't UTF in linux however). My objection is using it where there is no apparent gain on using something from the ASCII subset, such as this example. Jdowland 16:43, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)
My locale is utf, but how can you do this in ASCII? Ducon 01:26, 14 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Wikimedia is utf-8 compliant. Ducon 11:50, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
What do you mean by "fit in the article"? Sarge Baldy 10:26, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
In the JokeWAD article. Er… ☐? ☐ is neutral, maybe but maybe not, ☑ is yo, meant for it and ☒ is no, don’t even think about it (for example no deathmatch starts). For jokeWADs it may mean that the WAD is a bit jokey but not like nuts or mockery. Ducon 11:50, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)

article aim: list all wads? only noteable ones?

This page is growing too large to be easily readable. Should we not use the categories system to auto-generate a list of WADs which are note-worthy enough to have their own articles? -- Jdowland 11:43, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Good question. Maybe this this page should be replaced by a category and sub-categories. Ducon 17:29, 2 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Given the discussion at the top of this page, I suggest we have our first VFD :-) -- Jdowland
I dont think there's any need to delete it. I think it should be a useful quick reference list of popular WADs and their download links. Note that there are WADs listed here which havent been written up yet: the red links give a good incentive to people to write articles. Fraggle 10:51, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Co-op thing

I added an extra column on to the table to show co-op status of the map. This is because, especially with map packs with scripting, it is entirely possible to have a level pack that works in SP but not in co-op (Even in Vanilla it's possible through lack of starts). -- TheDarkArchon 01:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Good idea.  There are also levels that work in co-op but not solo (because it takes two people to open the exit room).    Ryan W 13:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Legality of Robocop

From license.txt:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, you may create a map editor, modify maps and 
make your own maps (collectively referenced as the "Permitted Derivative 
Works") for the Software.  You may not sell or distribute any Permitted 
Derivative Works but you may exchange the Permitted Derivative Works at no 
charge amongst other end-users.

The doom source code license and the GNU GPL don't contain anything particular about new wads in Doom, so I see this as the only possible source by which the Robocop wad could be "illegal". And while this quote certainly makes it illegal, it also appears to outlaw any wad file that includes something other than maps. Even if "maps" is considered to include the textures and flats in maps, certainly any wad which replaces menu graphics, sprites, sounds etc would be categorized as illegal.

I'd just like some concrete source on why Robocop is any more or less illegal then a load of other pc/tcs, because without it there's no reason to single it out with the "technically illegal" comment. Goyuken 03:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)