Difference between revisions of "Talk:Making a fake 3D platform"
From DoomWiki.org
(Categorize deletion thread as possible notability/scope precedent. This is very subjective, so if anyone feels strongly, feel free to revert me; see the original discussion.) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Agreed. Page moved to Legacy editing section. - [[User:Giomancer|Giomancer]] 17:26, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT) | :Agreed. Page moved to Legacy editing section. - [[User:Giomancer|Giomancer]] 17:26, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | There should be little screenshots here. [[User:Ducon|Ducon]] 16:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Question: Is the legacy method compatible with GZdoom?--[[User:Glaber|Glaber]] 19:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Deletion nomination == | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Vfd-deleted|trivial=0}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Same reasons as for [[Talk:Making a fake slope|the slope page]]: it's misleading because it's not a fake thing, and it's redundant with port-specific documentation. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] 20:38, July 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I agree. '''Delete''' it and point to the existing port-specific information instead. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 07:35, July 19, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:07, 7 December 2019
The tutorial MR ROCKET gave is good, but is for making a 3d floor in legacy ;) This page was originally for fake 3d floors in vanilla doom. This page should therefore be moved to a more appropriatly named page.
I've rewritten this to be in a more readable style. I havent done any legacy editing myself so somebody should check to see that what I've written is correct. Fraggle 10:13, 10 Feb 2005 (GMT)
- Agreed. Page moved to Legacy editing section. - Giomancer 17:26, 11 Mar 2005 (GMT)
There should be little screenshots here. Ducon 16:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Question: Is the legacy method compatible with GZdoom?--Glaber 19:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Deletion nomination[edit]
 | The content associated with this talk page was considered for deletion, and either was deleted, or was kept after a period of discussion. This page has been retained for historical reference regarding the deletion process, or in case of future restoration of any deleted content. |
Same reasons as for the slope page: it's misleading because it's not a fake thing, and it's redundant with port-specific documentation. --Gez 20:38, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete it and point to the existing port-specific information instead. -- Janizdreg 07:35, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
