Difference between revisions of "Talk:Making a fake slope"
From DoomWiki.org
(Re: "Suggesting Deletion) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: If you mean [[Editing tutorials|this page]], there is also a subsection for port-specific features, so the link could simply be moved there. That said, some ports already have detailed editing instructions on their own wikis (especially ZDoom); perhaps we should think about how much duplication of effort is worthwhile. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 23:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | : If you mean [[Editing tutorials|this page]], there is also a subsection for port-specific features, so the link could simply be moved there. That said, some ports already have detailed editing instructions on their own wikis (especially ZDoom); perhaps we should think about how much duplication of effort is worthwhile. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 23:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tagging it for deletion. Why? It's misleading (what it describes is ''not'' a fake slope), it's not complete enough to be useful, and it's redundant with the info on the ZDoom wiki. --[[User:Gez|Gez]] 19:04, July 18, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:04, 18 July 2010
Suggesting Deletion: Should port specific editing features be detailed on this wiki? This is the only port specific editing feature under this section. All the other articles are for Vanilla compatible editing features. 86.159.122.10.
- If you mean this page, there is also a subsection for port-specific features, so the link could simply be moved there. That said, some ports already have detailed editing instructions on their own wikis (especially ZDoom); perhaps we should think about how much duplication of effort is worthwhile. Ryan W 23:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Tagging it for deletion. Why? It's misleading (what it describes is not a fake slope), it's not complete enough to be useful, and it's redundant with the info on the ZDoom wiki. --Gez 19:04, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
