Editing Talk:ONEMANDOOM: WAD Reviews
From DoomWiki.org
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
In this [[Special:Diff/320297|edit]] the structure section is fine, but copying the list of reviews per year from the source site in seemingly random order is very questionable. Personally, I fail to see the point: the volume is huge, the local list is bound to fall out of date when the source adds new entries, and the source tables are already sortable in multiple ways. Thus a list here would add nothing that the source doesn't do, not even summarize stuff in a new, meaningful way (one of the main purposes of an encyclopedia). --[[User:Xymph|Xymph]] ([[User talk:Xymph|talk]]) 11:16, 26 February 2022 (CST) | In this [[Special:Diff/320297|edit]] the structure section is fine, but copying the list of reviews per year from the source site in seemingly random order is very questionable. Personally, I fail to see the point: the volume is huge, the local list is bound to fall out of date when the source adds new entries, and the source tables are already sortable in multiple ways. Thus a list here would add nothing that the source doesn't do, not even summarize stuff in a new, meaningful way (one of the main purposes of an encyclopedia). --[[User:Xymph|Xymph]] ([[User talk:Xymph|talk]]) 11:16, 26 February 2022 (CST) | ||
:Seconded. Xymph has already said everything I could say. [[User:Gauss|Gauss]] ([[User talk:Gauss|talk]]) 11:24, 26 February 2022 (CST) | :Seconded. Xymph has already said everything I could say. [[User:Gauss|Gauss]] ([[User talk:Gauss|talk]]) 11:24, 26 February 2022 (CST) | ||
− |