Difference between revisions of "Talk:Random chaos"
From DoomWiki.org
(delete) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: '''Delete.''' The copy-paste issue alone would be sufficient for deletion IMHO. Even absent any licensing concerns, it is usually easier to write an encyclopedic article from scratch than to create one starting with ad copy or a message board. We don't yet have a notability guideline for clans, but a clan can be created with almost no resources, so I assume they are much more numerous and more ephemeral than Doom web sites (for example), and therefore the standard would be more stringent — very few clans qualify. The authors of this article don't even ''assert'' that the clan is unusually noteworthy. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC) | : '''Delete.''' The copy-paste issue alone would be sufficient for deletion IMHO. Even absent any licensing concerns, it is usually easier to write an encyclopedic article from scratch than to create one starting with ad copy or a message board. We don't yet have a notability guideline for clans, but a clan can be created with almost no resources, so I assume they are much more numerous and more ephemeral than Doom web sites (for example), and therefore the standard would be more stringent — very few clans qualify. The authors of this article don't even ''assert'' that the clan is unusually noteworthy. [[User:Ryan W|Ryan W]] 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 18:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC) | :'''Delete'''. -- [[User:Janizdreg|Janizdreg]] 18:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | As per unanimous consensus, I've deleted the article. | ||
Revision as of 07:43, 6 December 2007
Nominating for deletion
Aside from the fact that this is unencylopedic and seems to be copy-pasted from a website, I think this is probably something that should have a short mention on the Skulltag article rather than its own article (fitting with the clans section on ZDaemon. Fraggle 12:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fraggle 12:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. TheDarkArchon 14:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Zack 15:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, and I must add that the content was definitely copied and pasted from their website. TheGreenHerring 01:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The copy-paste issue alone would be sufficient for deletion IMHO. Even absent any licensing concerns, it is usually easier to write an encyclopedic article from scratch than to create one starting with ad copy or a message board. We don't yet have a notability guideline for clans, but a clan can be created with almost no resources, so I assume they are much more numerous and more ephemeral than Doom web sites (for example), and therefore the standard would be more stringent — very few clans qualify. The authors of this article don't even assert that the clan is unusually noteworthy. Ryan W 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Janizdreg 18:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
As per unanimous consensus, I've deleted the article.
