Editing Talk:Serpent Riders

From DoomWiki.org

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
== Bad screenshot ==
fuck this nubz
What a terrible screenshot. Can we really not do any better than the bosses' sprites pasted onto a flat texture taken in some ugly looking source port beta version in some unrelated project? How about screenshots of the actual bosses in their actual games fighting their actual players? I'd help but I don't have Hexen II and thus the set would be incomplete.--[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] 03:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
:I don't have hexen ii either, but yeah, that's a terrible screenshot --[[User:AlexMax|AlexMax]] 03:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
: I've moved the EBDoom section to the EBDoom article.  [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 08:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
: We've rather established that Hexen 2 is off-topic so I wouldn't worry about Eidolon. -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 12:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
== EBDoom section ==
Because to remove this section? It reffers to the Serpent Riders, so it must be kept (as well as the information that is in articles of the [[D'Sparil #Uses outside of Heretic|D'Sparil]] and [[Korax #Uses outside of Hexen|Korax]]).
[[User:Cacodemon|Cacodemon]] 21:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
: It isn't "canonical" information about them, just information about how they appear in a TC.  I think in general we should keep the main articles focused on information from the actual games. 
: If you want my personal opinion, EBDoom looks like a pretty horrible mess of a TC.  It's bad enough that we have the enormous incoherent article about it, without references to it spreading to other articles as well.
: [[EBDoom]] is the one article on the wiki that I never even look at; it's such a mess that I wouldn't even know where to begin in cleaning it up.  At the same time I'm not convinced that it's even notable enough to be worth my time expending the effort. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 01:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
::I agree with fraggle.  --[[User:AlexMax|AlexMax]] 01:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
:::I also agree. It's quite ridiculous that a WAD like EarthBound Doom has the second largest article on this wiki. The sooner that huge section of the page were to be moved to the other wiki, the better. I myself would clean it up, but I feel just the same about it as Fraggle. [[User:DomRem|<font color="red">Dom</font><font color="blue">Rem</font>]] | <small>[[User_talk:DomRem|Yeah?]]</small> 01:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
:::: I also think that the article of the EBDoom is very big. Therefore we do not have to increase the article putting this section of serpent riders!
:::: Also the information about the serpent riders is already available in the part where it is written about D'Sparil, Korax and Eidolon.
:::: You have not explained me yet because the article of the [[D'Sparil #Uses outside of Heretic|D'Sparil]] and the [[Korax #Uses outside of Hexen|Korax]] can have one section with the EBD and the Serpent Riders cannot… [[User:Cacodemon|Cacodemon]] 23:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
::::: Agreed.  I've removed the EBDoom section from the Korax article.  Is there EBDoom stuff in any other articles?  [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 23:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

All contributions to DoomWiki.org are considered to be released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 International (see Doom Wiki:Copyrights for details). By contributing, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use.
Your changes will be visible immediately. Please enter a summary of your changes above.

Do not submit copyrighted images or text without permission! This includes text taken from in-game codices or logbooks, or from official instruction manuals, strategy guides, and other such books.

This project is not affiliated with id Software, Raven Software, ZeniMax Media, Bethesda SoftWorks, or any other commercial software developer or publisher. Use of trademarked logos and other protected intellectual property is solely for the purpose of analysis and critical commentary on the identified products and associated fan community activity, and does not imply any endorsement by any of these organizations or their employees, past or present.

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)