Difference between revisions of "Talk:Serpent Riders"

From DoomWiki.org

(EBDoom section)
(agreement)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
: [[EBDoom]] is the one article on the wiki that I never even look at; it's such a mess that I wouldn't even know where to begin in cleaning it up.  At the same time I'm not convinced that it's even notable enough to be worth my time expending the effort. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 01:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 
: [[EBDoom]] is the one article on the wiki that I never even look at; it's such a mess that I wouldn't even know where to begin in cleaning it up.  At the same time I'm not convinced that it's even notable enough to be worth my time expending the effort. [[User:Fraggle|Fraggle]] 01:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 
::I agree with fraggle.  --[[User:AlexMax|AlexMax]] 01:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 
::I agree with fraggle.  --[[User:AlexMax|AlexMax]] 01:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 +
:::I also agree. It's quite ridiculous that a WAD like EarthBound Doom has the second largest article on this wiki. The sooner that huge section of the page were to be moved to the other wiki, the better. I myself would clean it up, but I feel just the same about it as Fraggle. [[User:DomRem|<font color="red">Dom</font><font color="blue">Rem</font>]] | <small>[[User_talk:DomRem|Yeah?]]</small> 01:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 25 May 2006

Bad screenshot

What a terrible screenshot. Can we really not do any better than the bosses' sprites pasted onto a flat texture taken in some ugly looking source port beta version in some unrelated project? How about screenshots of the actual bosses in their actual games fighting their actual players? I'd help but I don't have Hexen II and thus the set would be incomplete.--Quasar 03:42, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't have hexen ii either, but yeah, that's a terrible screenshot --AlexMax 03:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I've moved the EBDoom section to the EBDoom article. Fraggle 08:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
We've rather established that Hexen 2 is off-topic so I wouldn't worry about Eidolon. -- Jdowland 12:04, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

EBDoom section

Because to remove this section? It reffers to the Serpent Riders, so it must be kept (as well as the information that is in articles of the D'Sparil and Korax). Cacodemon 21:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

It isn't "canonical" information about them, just information about how they appear in a TC. I think in general we should keep the main articles focused on information from the actual games.
If you want my personal opinion, EBDoom looks like a pretty horrible mess of a TC. It's bad enough that we have the enormous incoherent article about it, without references to it spreading to other articles as well.
EBDoom is the one article on the wiki that I never even look at; it's such a mess that I wouldn't even know where to begin in cleaning it up. At the same time I'm not convinced that it's even notable enough to be worth my time expending the effort. Fraggle 01:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree with fraggle. --AlexMax 01:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
I also agree. It's quite ridiculous that a WAD like EarthBound Doom has the second largest article on this wiki. The sooner that huge section of the page were to be moved to the other wiki, the better. I myself would clean it up, but I feel just the same about it as Fraggle. DomRem | Yeah? 01:30, 26 May 2006 (UTC)