Talk:Tim Willits

Hey, Wacky, if you are going to VfD something, at least put something on the talk page. ;) Anyway, delete because of lack of accurate content and can always be re-added later. Changed to Keep: Proper content has been added. -- TheDarkArchon 21:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I think this article should have a high-priority here. I reckon deleting it would hamper getting a good page up in this case. I've just imported some relevant bits and pieces from the corresponding wikipedia article, does that influence your opinion? -- Jdowland 22:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep. Relevant because of his contributions to the Doom community and the position he is in now as a result. Fraggle 22:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Lack of content should not be a proper criteria for deletion. The subject of this article is clearly notable enough, and the stub looks fine for other users to add content later. DomRem | Yeah? 01:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

After actually looking through the history, I see that it was previously just one sentence. Although I still think it should be given time to be cleaned up and expanded anyway, good job to Jdowland for greatly improving the article. DomRem | Yeah? 03:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep - He's one of only a few people who impressed id enough to get levels in both Ultimate Doom and the Master Levels, so he's certainly important enough to have an article. It still needs some elaboration though, especially on his work on Doom 3. CODOR 03:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)