Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline of mod releases"
From DoomWiki.org
(One suggested rule of thumb for listing of mods here) |
(→Suggested rule of thumb) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Suggested rule of thumb== | ==Suggested rule of thumb== | ||
Unless sold commercially or mentioned in mainstream media (which are probably qualifying criteria for an article anyway), a mod should be notable enough to already have an article on the wiki in order to be listed here. This shouldn't be construed as meaning all mods with articles have to be listed; I'm not going to try to figure that out but will rely on the community to come to a functional consensus. There should not be red links on the timeline is the basic rule I'm suggesting. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 16:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC) | Unless sold commercially or mentioned in mainstream media (which are probably qualifying criteria for an article anyway), a mod should be notable enough to already have an article on the wiki in order to be listed here. This shouldn't be construed as meaning all mods with articles have to be listed; I'm not going to try to figure that out but will rely on the community to come to a functional consensus. There should not be red links on the timeline is the basic rule I'm suggesting. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 16:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :How notable should a wad be to be added to this list? It would be something we had more specifics on this issue. [[User:Justice Infinity|Justice ∞]] ([[User talk:Justice Infinity|talk]]) 12:06, 21 April 2016 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:06, 21 April 2016
Suggested rule of thumb[edit]
Unless sold commercially or mentioned in mainstream media (which are probably qualifying criteria for an article anyway), a mod should be notable enough to already have an article on the wiki in order to be listed here. This shouldn't be construed as meaning all mods with articles have to be listed; I'm not going to try to figure that out but will rely on the community to come to a functional consensus. There should not be red links on the timeline is the basic rule I'm suggesting. --Quasar (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
