Difference between revisions of "Talk:WAD"
From DoomWiki.org
(→Cinder colour blazing eyes) |
(→Cinder colour blazing eyes) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:[http://5years.doomworld.com/doombible/doombible.pdf Doom Bible], page 67. [[User:Fredrik|Fredrik]] 16:26, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC) | :[http://5years.doomworld.com/doombible/doombible.pdf Doom Bible], page 67. [[User:Fredrik|Fredrik]] 16:26, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ||
::I've put this in the article itself; you should have done that, it would have saved me time.-[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 05:18, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ::I've put this in the article itself; you should have done that, it would have saved me time.-[[User:Ashley Pomeroy|Ashley Pomeroy]] 05:18, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::If you didn't have time to do it, you could have left it for someone else :P -- [[User:Jdowland|Jdowland]] 08:42, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:42, 12 July 2005
Have you seen the UDS copyright info? Are you sure we can derive from it for the wiki? - Jdowland 11:36, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)
- I don't see any text lifted from the UDS. As long as we're just using it for reference purposes and not copying anything, then there is no issue. Bloodshedder 11:48, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)
UNIX 'file' command
Here's the entry the UNIX file command uses to identify WADs:
# Thomas M. Ott (ThMO) 1 string =WAD DOOM data, >0 string =I main wad >0 string =P patch wad >0 byte x unknown junk
This could easily be elaborated on if someone wanted to :) - Jdowland 07:46, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Cinder colour blazing eyes
Is WAD officially an acronym of "Where's All the Data", as the article states? And if so, could someone put a reference in the article? I always assumed that WAD was supposed to be the word 'wad', [1] nothing more complex than that.-Ashley Pomeroy 14:31, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Doom Bible, page 67. Fredrik 16:26, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- I've put this in the article itself; you should have done that, it would have saved me time.-Ashley Pomeroy 05:18, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- If you didn't have time to do it, you could have left it for someone else :P -- Jdowland 08:42, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- I've put this in the article itself; you should have done that, it would have saved me time.-Ashley Pomeroy 05:18, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)