Talk:WAD

From DoomWiki.org

Revision as of 05:09, 22 October 2006 by Russell (talk | contribs) (offset and directories)

Have you seen the UDS copyright info? Are you sure we can derive from it for the wiki? - Jdowland 11:36, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)

I don't see any text lifted from the UDS. As long as we're just using it for reference purposes and not copying anything, then there is no issue. Bloodshedder 11:48, 25 Mar 2005 (EST)

UNIX 'file' command

Here's the entry the UNIX file command uses to identify WADs:

# Thomas M. Ott (ThMO)
1       string  =WAD            DOOM data,
>0      string  =I              main wad
>0      string  =P              patch wad
>0      byte    x               unknown junk

This could easily be elaborated on if someone wanted to :) - Jdowland 07:46, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Cinder colour blazing eyes

Is WAD officially an acronym of "Where's All the Data", as the article states? And if so, could someone put a reference in the article? I always assumed that WAD was supposed to be the word 'wad', [1] nothing more complex than that.-Ashley Pomeroy 14:31, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Doom Bible, page 67. Fredrik 16:26, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I've put this in the article itself; you should have done that, it would have saved me time.-Ashley Pomeroy 05:18, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
If you didn't have time to do it, you could have left it for someone else :P -- Jdowland 08:42, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

restriction on lump names

Only the characters A-Z (uppercase), 0-9, and [ ] - _ should be used in lump names (an exception has to be made for some of the Arch-Vile sprites, which use "\").. Is this true, or badly-phrased? A reference to the limitation in the code would be nice. I thought anything which passed isascii() was OK. -- Jdowland 22:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

offset and directories

I was speaking to florian schulze on #doom-tech a while ago, we were talking about the directory and lump offsets. He stated that the directory offset to the entry information table (which contains offset, size and the name) has an unsigned 32bit value. this is the same for the lump offset.

Can anyone confirm this?