Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Doom series"
From DoomWiki.org
(Initial commit) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
That aside, I find nothing to dislike about the format — it's so much easier now to use a standard style! — and all the executables seem to be in there, even the redlinked ones. ;> I could suggest mentioning one [[How to download and run Doom|how-to article]], Versions, (maybe) commercial PWADs, and (maybe maybe) Doom clones. [[User talk:Ryan W|Ryan W]] ''([[User:Ryan W|living fossil]])'' 20:47, 22 September 2018 (CDT) | That aside, I find nothing to dislike about the format — it's so much easier now to use a standard style! — and all the executables seem to be in there, even the redlinked ones. ;> I could suggest mentioning one [[How to download and run Doom|how-to article]], Versions, (maybe) commercial PWADs, and (maybe maybe) Doom clones. [[User talk:Ryan W|Ryan W]] ''([[User:Ryan W|living fossil]])'' 20:47, 22 September 2018 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : I'm hoping to address the remaining red links before rolling it out. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 02:04, 23 September 2018 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:04, 23 September 2018
Initial commit[edit]
Quasar asked for feedback on IRC. I assume this is intended for the bottom of an article? I'm sure I've said we could use Wikipedia-style navboxes if we postulated the reader's attention span to extend all the way down. That might be a controversial position in a gaming community. :P
That aside, I find nothing to dislike about the format — it's so much easier now to use a standard style! — and all the executables seem to be in there, even the redlinked ones. ;> I could suggest mentioning one how-to article, Versions, (maybe) commercial PWADs, and (maybe maybe) Doom clones. Ryan W (living fossil) 20:47, 22 September 2018 (CDT)