From DoomWiki.org
(archiving past discussions) |
(→Request for a publication: New topic) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
: '''Archived discussions: [[User talk:Ryan W/2005|2005]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2006|2006]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2007|2007]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2008|2008]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2009|2009]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2010|2010]]''', '''[[User talk:Ryan W/2011|2011]]''', '''[[User talk:Ryan W/2012|2012]]''' | : '''Archived discussions: [[User talk:Ryan W/2005|2005]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2006|2006]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2007|2007]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2008|2008]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2009|2009]], [[User talk:Ryan W/2010|2010]]''', '''[[User talk:Ryan W/2011|2011]]''', '''[[User talk:Ryan W/2012|2012]]''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Request for a publication== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello, Ryan. [[Doom II]] is quality stuff, so I have to ask a Reviewer to get my change published. With [http://www.doom.com.hr/index.php?page=compet-n_database&cndb=1&wad=2&category=movie&map=0&player=0¤t= this] as your guide, could you give your judgement about [[Doom II#Speedrunning|the updated Compet-N table]] in the article? I added a separate table to my [[User:Jartapran/sandbox#Speedrunning|subpage]]; the content there is identical to the one in Doom II but the listing order is from the Compet-N site. If you make comparisons between the source site and the table, it would happen more conveniently via the subpage. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've checked the data ''once'' myself and tested that the links work. There were no problems with those, but there's one questionable thing: according to the point policy for game movies (MAP01 - MAP30/32, "ALL"), some of the categories have two or three current records instead of one (they give a varying amount of points). However, I thought to only add the '''fastest''' records of the categories; that is the way things have been done in the wiki so far, and I'm pretty sure that the majority of readers are more interested in seeing fast playthroughs than knowing what kind of awards the speedrunners have had. Still, it's just an opinion among others. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Feel free to comment on your decision. --[[User:Jartapran|Jartapran]] 20:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:27, 10 May 2013
Request for a publication
Hello, Ryan. Doom II is quality stuff, so I have to ask a Reviewer to get my change published. With this as your guide, could you give your judgement about the updated Compet-N table in the article? I added a separate table to my subpage; the content there is identical to the one in Doom II but the listing order is from the Compet-N site. If you make comparisons between the source site and the table, it would happen more conveniently via the subpage.
I've checked the data once myself and tested that the links work. There were no problems with those, but there's one questionable thing: according to the point policy for game movies (MAP01 - MAP30/32, "ALL"), some of the categories have two or three current records instead of one (they give a varying amount of points). However, I thought to only add the fastest records of the categories; that is the way things have been done in the wiki so far, and I'm pretty sure that the majority of readers are more interested in seeing fast playthroughs than knowing what kind of awards the speedrunners have had. Still, it's just an opinion among others.
Feel free to comment on your decision. --Jartapran 20:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
