From DoomWiki.org
m (→Replaced images without checking their usage: perhaps not as much as thought initially.) |
m (→Replaced images without checking their usage: that sounded kind of mean, not my intent :|) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Replaced images without checking their usage== | ==Replaced images without checking their usage== | ||
| − | Please do not replace any more image uploads without checking the context of their usage on every article. You have inadvertently broken some of my discussion of the weapons' revision histories on their individual pages by doing this. I | + | Please do not replace any more image uploads without checking the context of their usage on every article. You have inadvertently broken some of my discussion of the weapons' revision histories on their individual pages by doing this. I hope that you will help clean up the problem going forward. --[[User:Quasar|Quasar]] ([[User talk:Quasar|talk]]) 23:40, 5 June 2019 (CDT) |
Revision as of 23:56, 5 June 2019
You said: "I hope sommeone helps implementing templates in levels..." Two suggestions off the top of my head: add the templates to Template:Map skel, and drop a note to whoever has been creating map articles lately (TheGreenHerring and Jimmy91 come to mind). That will at least increase the chance that they'll be used in new articles.
As for the backlog, yes, it's a big job. Now you know why so many walkthrough articles are missing. :> Unfortunately, I myself can't promise anyone anything right now, as I have been horribly busy with real-life stuff. Ryan W 16:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Contractions
Just a little pointer for your future edits; please do not use contractions in articles. Not using them is specifically mentioned in Doom Wiki's policy and it isn't proper encyclopedic style. Otherwise, keep up the good work! -- Janizdreg 21:02, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Roger that! hfc2X 00:52, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
BREAKING NEWS
- DoomWiki has a new wiki home! http://doomwiki.shoutwiki.com BlingBling (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2019 (CDT)
Replaced images without checking their usage
Please do not replace any more image uploads without checking the context of their usage on every article. You have inadvertently broken some of my discussion of the weapons' revision histories on their individual pages by doing this. I hope that you will help clean up the problem going forward. --Quasar (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2019 (CDT)
