Talk:ZPack - Random Maps for ZDoom

103 bytes added, 5 February
Subarticles and improving the page
: For a no-objection clause in more elaborate proposal like this, I really think you should allow more than two days of response time. Editors/admins don't always have time to react so quickly, or formulate their opinion on a proposal. I don't know what an appropriate minimum would be, but I guess at least a week. And in this case, since the merges were already discussed before but not performed, hasty action seems certainly inappropriate. My 2 cents for now, I haven't had time to think about all parts of the above yet either. --[[User:Xymph|Xymph]] ([[User talk:Xymph|talk]]) 16:11, 5 February 2021 (CST)
:: Fair enough, I had an off the record conversation with Quasar about it and he did tell me to wait at least a few days, which I figured would be enough since the changes done, in the end, aren't that radical: the information relayed is pretty much exactly the same as before (I only left out some frankly superfluous lines, such as "Episode 3 is where the player travels to Hell to settle the score once and for all", which, well, describes almost any E3 ever, so I see no point in mentioning that specifically), only presented in a fashion that more closely follow all the other articles on the wiki. I will definitely keep this in mind in case I ever rework pages that would require a much more thorough re-organization ([[Demon Eclipse]] and [[NeoDoom]] come to mind), but in the case of ZPack, I felt it was a fairly straightforward and simple change that I think shouldn't prove problematic. I guess the main question is whether the contributors list should be added back in, but that's easily done if necessary. For such cases in the future I'll likely wait for admins' opinions first, as they are more convoluted. --[[User:Dynamo128|Dynamo128]] ([[User talk:Dynamo128|talk]]) 16:27, 5 February 2021 (CST)