Talk:Doom comic


Value judgments[edit]

This article needs some help. The part on criticism is unsourced, which makes it look like the contributors added personal opinions and then attributed that to a general consensus or community agreement. In any case, I think the main character of the comic is that it's silly but amusing, rather than simply "bad" (besides, the most common target for "this sucks" criticism are the novels, rather more so than the movie). But the wiki shouldn't be a place for value judgments unless they're placed in a context ("Y group/person considers X to be awesome because..." or "Y has expressed criticism towards X, arguing that..."). Who is like God? 21:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Edition differences[edit]

Most of this entire section is missing needed clarification on which edition is which, and in particular when describing differences, stating what was in the other edition, such as the ads. Great, so we know which ads were in one edition. What about the other one? This requires refinement. Linguica may have both editions available for direct comparison so hopefully this can get worked out quickly. --Quasar (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2016 (CDT)

I find it doubtful he has any edition... --Chungy (talk) 12:53, 22 May 2016 (CDT)
You're clearly not in #doomtwid right now ;) Anyway I have resolved this now. --Quasar (talk) 13:05, 22 May 2016 (CDT)