Talk:Holden's Doom



The article says that the mod is "upcoming", which means the article isn't qualified to exist until the mod is released, as our policy states. Therefore, delete. -- Janizdreg 21:03, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

  • Neutral.  I wish this were actually the policy, because it is an objective criterion and discourages vanity editing.  However, it has been argued that an unreleased WAD can be notable if it is already widely discussed (like KDiZD or the Toke tribute), and our newest articles about unreleased WADs have not always been deleted.  See discussion here.    Ryan W 21:33, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Yes, that has been argued before, but it hasn't reached a point of consensus at least yet. Also, Holden's Doom obviously hasn't been widely discussed. In fact, I hardly see it mentioned anywhere at all. So, if I were to choose my vote based on the notability criteria for unreleased WADs, I'd still vote delete. -- Janizdreg 21:54, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
  • I see trailers, and stuff on a web search, but no project page. As such, the page isn't useful even if the game was released, since we wouldn't be able to find said game; and since it isn't yet released even in demo form, there isn't much confirmation for the mod/pwad in question. Delete unless this can be corrected. --Sigma 7 19:38, November 21, 2009 (UTC)