Edit-paste.svgThe content associated with this talk page was considered for deletion, and either was deleted, or was kept after a period of discussion. This page has been retained for historical reference regarding the deletion process, or in case of future restoration of any deleted content.

I think this material is already covered adequately by Linedef.

  • Delete.    Ryan W 15:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete.. Absolutely. -- Jdowland 22:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • There's no need to go through a delete process when a redirect would work just fine. Just make it a redirect to Linedef already. Bloodshedder 23:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
    • I agree, and I would have done that if I'd got to the article first, but once Ryan had filed a vfd, I thought it rude to make such an edit. -- Jdowland 00:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Redirect to Linedef -- I think it's the best option. -- TheDarkArchon 02:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
And I thought it rude to just erase the new text without a discussion.  :>   That, and I have never before seen "line" used for "linedef" (to refer to LOS calculations and hitscan attacks, yes).  If you folks have, then I'll vote for a redirect also.    Ryan W 00:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)