Information about bannings on other forums[edit]

That kind of temporal information for person articles is considered off-topic and inflammatory, so I reverted your change. If you feel the person is not notable enough to have an article, nominate it for deletion. Otherwise, it should adhere to community guidelines and only explain the person's works and accomplishments related to Doom. --Quasar 06:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I thought that information would be relevant to the article since it indicated an historical events about the person getting banned from both of those forums. I wasn't actually trying to flame the person, I was just stating a fact. I wonder if it's appropriate to discuss his drama on his own article, but because it's not appropriate according to you, I'm just not going to bother. Justice ∞ 12:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Understood. We have gotten a number of requests in the past from individuals to have such information removed though, so I feel it's best to stick only to factual information in personal articles, explaining releases and activities, and neither going off into praise or criticism (even if not meant in that way, a listing of sites someone's been banned from can be looked at as a condemnation of their social status or personality very easily). --Quasar 19:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)


You had messaged me a while ago. Is there any way to PM you? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Monkeyofeons (talkcontribs) 18:35, 29 September 2015‎.

I tried talking to you if that name of Dark Exodus was real and I guess it was and it turns out you're him the whole time under a different name. Justice ∞ (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2015 (CDT)