Partial invisibility patterns as bug

What gives you the impression that the partial invisibility effect doesn't work as intended? Image generation algorithms (such as fire effects) frequently have similar emergent patterns in them but aren't considered bugs, just quirks at the most. I'm wavering on accepting the revision as accurate/cited without a better explanation of why this should be considered a bug and not something that Carmack was happy with as is. --Quasar (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm not saying Carmack wasn't happy with it the way it is, but I think there's a good chance that the stippling effect was more of a "happy accident" than something intentional. --Linguica (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please review demo changes

I have some issues with your changes to Demo which are discussed on its talk page; some minor formatting complaints and a more serious factual accuracy error. --Quasar (talk) 07:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Article moves

I realize you're not able to move articles since you haven't earned editor promotion yet but the proper thing to do if an article needs to be renamed is the following:

• Tag the article at the top with {{Request move}}
• Leave a note on the article's talk page.
• Bring it up on Central Processing if necessary.

You should not create the article at the new title because this blocks the move of the already existing article to the new location, or, if the old article were to be deleted, would destroy its edit history. --Quasar (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2016 (CDT)